Dispatch runs on memory
Scheduling depends on one person's knowledge of who is free, not a system anyone else can run.
Field operations
When dispatch, field work, equipment, parts and billing live in separate systems, Kritical maps the end-to-end process and scopes Dynamics 365 Field Service with the integrations and operating ownership it needs to run clearly.
On this page
Jump to the part that matches the problem or decision in front of you.
Microsoft positions Dynamics 365 Field Service around modernising dispatch and the technician workforce: AI-assisted scheduling that fills the calendar efficiently, Copilot support for building and updating work orders, a self-service portal so customers can see status without calling, a mobile app built for use on site, and IoT or remote-assistance features for equipment-heavy work. None of that tells you who owns the part number when three systems disagree, or what a technician must record before a job counts as finished. That is the operating model Kritical builds around the application.
Scheduling depends on one person's knowledge of who is free, not a system anyone else can run.
A technician arrives without the part, or the system says it exists somewhere it does not.
Technicians work in basements, regional sites or vehicles where the app has to work offline first.

The solution can connect Dynamics 365 Sales or Customer Service, inventory and purchasing, projects, billing, identity, maps or specialist line-of-business systems. The design records which platform creates each transaction and how failures are found and reconciled.

Map one ordinary job and one difficult exception — a missed appointment, an unavailable part or a device with no signal.
A scoped discovery produces a work-order lifecycle, an asset and inventory model, and a written price for build and rollout.
Use the product documentation as a capability reference, then scope the field journey, records and responsibilities your organisation needs.
Explore work orders, scheduling, mobile, assets and connected field-service processes.
Offline and mobile requirements are tested against the selected application, data and device configuration. The scope identifies what must stay available and how synchronisation is handled.
Yes, where the required records and transactions are agreed. The integration design identifies ownership, mappings, timing, failures and reconciliation.
No. This service scopes and coordinates the technology and operating process. Your organisation or service provider remains responsible for the field workforce and any regulated trade work.
Work-order volume, mobile and offline requirements, asset data and integrations change the implementation cost too much for one number. You get a scoped, written quote instead.
Representative work orders, field roles, asset records, current scheduling method, connectivity constraints and the exception scenarios that cause the most trouble.
Sometimes, and sometimes it should sit alongside a specialist scheduling engine your industry already relies on. We assess the current tool's fit before recommending a replacement rather than assuming one.
A pilot group tests the device, connectivity and offline behaviour first, with feedback fed back into configuration before the wider rollout. Technicians are trained on the actual workflow.
Tell us what you want to achieve, what you have today and when it matters.