Estimates and delivery disagree
The number that was sold bears no resemblance to the hours going into the job.
Project-based business
When estimates, resource plans, time, costs and invoices tell three different stories about the same job, Kritical maps the project lifecycle and scopes Dynamics 365 Project Operations around a commercial and delivery model your team can run.
On this page
Jump to the part that matches the problem or decision in front of you.
Microsoft describes Project Operations as one AI-powered application that follows project work from the sales quote to the final invoice: pricing and contract tools on the sales side, resourcing that matches people to projects by skill and availability, AI-assisted time and expense entry that flags outliers, progressive billing across different contract types, and finance features that track project profitability against a broader ERP. That covers the software. It does not decide which system owns a contract once it is signed, or how your resource managers allocate people when two projects compete for the same person — that is the lifecycle mapping Kritical runs before configuration starts.
The number that was sold bears no resemblance to the hours going into the job.
Two projects need the same person in the same week, and nobody can see that until it is too late.
Invoices go out on a different basis to how the work was tracked and approved.

Project managers, resource managers, sales and finance need different views. We define the measures, source records, timing and access required for workload, progress, forecast, cost, billing and exception reporting, including Power BI where appropriate.

Follow one project from opportunity to final invoice and name where the handoffs break down today.
A scoped discovery produces a lifecycle map, a contract and billing model, and a written price for build and rollout.
Use the product documentation to compare deployment patterns and capabilities before selecting the implementation path.
Explore sales, resourcing, project management, time, expense and finance integration across the available deployment models.
The decision depends on the project lifecycle, commercial model, resourcing and reporting requirements rather than project size alone. We compare the process before recommending the platform.
The deployment and integration design must establish which financial transactions stay in the current system and how project records are exchanged and reconciled. That is confirmed in discovery, not assumed.
Deployment pattern, resourcing rules and finance integration change the implementation cost too much for one published number. You get a scoped, written quote instead.
Where it is in scope. We define the measures and access each role needs before deciding whether Power BI or another reporting path fits the requirement.
Representative estimates, contracts, project plans, resource roles, time and expense rules, billing models and the reports people currently use to run delivery.
Yes, where the source system, data quality and mapping rules are agreed in advance. We identify what migrates, what is re-entered and what is retired before any project record moves.
Tell us what you want to achieve, what you have today and when it matters.